Glossary
Discussions
Products & Services
eCorr/2000
Consultants Network
New Content  |  Upcoming Content  |  Media Kit  |  Mission Statement  |  Site Map  |  Help Desk  |  Premium Content  |  Advertise
The Corrosion Journal for the Online Community


List of Articles









A Practical Approach to Identifying and Solving Microbially Influenced Production Problems

Online Corrosion Conference



Classic Failure Photographs

 

CATHODIC PROTECTION

Table 1 presents the results of a cost comparison study that shows the economic benefit of employing cathodic protection in manholes.2 Even after replacing the anodes three times, the costs of cathodic protection are only a small percentage of the costs of replacing the entire pipe.

1 Kilometer

 

Replacement Costs
Cathodic Protection Costs
Savings
Costs of Cathodic Protection as a Percentage of Replacement Costs
6 Inch Water Main
$800,000
$20,000 X 3 cycles
$740,000
7.5%
12 Inch Water Main
$1,100,000
$37,500 X 3 cycles
$978,500
10.25%

Table 1: Comparison of the Cost of Replacement and Cathodic Protection of One Kilometer of Water Mains in Ottawa-Carleton, Ontario Canada

 

VALVE CASE STUDY CONCLUSIONS

The case studies showed the significance of quality and cost of protective coatings, but, more importantly, they showed the overall quality that could be achieved by the use of some high quality coating materials. With the valve chamber protected with a wax coating 40 to 50 years of protection can be expected.

Monitoring of chambers is still essential in the maintenance process. In light of the potential for the stainless steel to fail as a result of crevice corrosion, close monitoring is required of the valve chambers even where stainless steel bolts have been installed. Each valve chamber will act differently in the corrosion cycle as the conductivity of the soil surrounding the chamber and, by default, the water entering the chamber is different. Again, each chamber will maintain infiltration and retain the water at a different rate thus affecting the corrosion rate.

These test sites will be monitored on a regular maintenance schedule as well as spot checks on some of the areas of a more critical nature. This will be a long process in the total assessment of the valves, both chambered and direct buried.

Careful progress will be required to understand all the possible types of corrosion that can affect the system. The most important part of this process is to gain the support of the staff on the necessary changes. The norm is always, "if it ain't broke don't fix it." Staff will perform a detailed review of each valve chamber and assess the valve condition and make the necessary changes, so that the correct field decisions are made. This decision-making matrix will only arrive through training and understanding of the application of corrosion control.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

A special thanks to Winston Revie and Tim Biere for their support and encouragement in preparing this paper.

REFERENCES

  1. J.T.N. Atkinson and H. Van Droffelaar, Corrosion and Its Control, An Introduction to the Subject, 2 nd Edition, NACE Intermational Houston, 1995 Page 270, 280, 281, 281.

  2. D. Raymond, "Cathodic Protection of Water Infrastructure in Cold Climate-Experience in the Region of Ottawa-Carleton, Ontario, Canada," Paper 01310, Corrosion 2001, NACE, Houston, 2001.

 

 

 

 

PAGE 1 2 3 4


Submitting Technical Articles to Corrosioneering